Marina moldova woman dating
Why would he have done that if he were acting alone? The idea that he took three shots with his bolt-action Italian rifle in the elapsed time (a few seconds) — taking out Kennedy with the head shot — is just outside the box of credibility. There are lots of other things, but for us, these four issues — taken together — make it very difficult to buy the Warren report.
We can probably explain away any one of these aspects, but the four things taken together with other anomalous facts create a critical mass of doubt.
The only strength of the Warren Commission report is the weakness of the alternative explanations: 1.
Kennedy was killed by the American Mafia because Bobby Kennedy came after them, despite the fact that Joseph Kennedy had cut a deal with Sam Giancana over the West Virginia primary and the graveyard vote in Illinois.
This is a reasonable explanation, except for the fact that it leaves no explanation for Oswald's role in the president's killing. Kennedy was killed by Cuban Intelligence because the Kennedys tried to kill Fidel Castro.
This is an interesting theory, except that it doesn't explain where Jack Ruby fits in. Kennedy was killed by the CIA because he wanted to pull out of Vietnam. These make for interesting reading, but the problem is that all of the hybrids wind up involving dozens of people from multiple groups, none with any reason to trust each other. The only way some of these theories work is if Lee Harvey Oswald was not involved or somehow was, in his words, made into a "patsy." For any of the conspiracy theories to work, Oswald would either have had to be an innocent victim, had someone else masquerading as him or been part of a conspiracy that his own background didn't easily bring him into.
This one suffers from the fact that the evidence that Kennedy wanted to pull out of Vietnam is pretty skimpy and the greater fact that, in 1963, Vietnam was one of a dozen foreign policy issues out there. It really all comes down to who Lee Harvey Oswald was — a subject that has garnered endless speculation.
Rather, the speculation is endless because the official explanation offered by the Warren Commission is difficult to believe.
That may have been the way it happened, but it is not a genuinely satisfactory explanation.
We don't have problems with the idea that Lee Harvey Oswald was a shooter, but we do have problems with the idea that he was the lone gunman.
There are four crucial points that, for us at least, make it extremely unlikely that Oswald was operating alone: 1.
Oswald had a beautiful, unobstructed shot from the Texas Schoolbook Depository building in Dallas as the presidential motorcade approached. The idea that Jack Ruby, a strip club owner and connected guy, went to the Dallas police station on an impulse and was so overwhelmed by uncontrollable rage at the death of his president that he shot Lee Harvey Oswald strains our credulity beyond its limits.
Search for marina moldova woman dating:
He passed on a perfect shot, choosing instead to allow the motorcade to turn left and proceed below his window, and then took a much more difficult shot with his view partially obscured by a tree. The trajectory of the bullet that was supposed to have hit the president and Texas Gov. Ruby was a lot of things, but sentimental was not one of them. Whatever brought him to the station to kill Oswald was not uncontrolled emotion.